Hydrogen’s potential and policy pathways for Indonesia’s energy transition: The actor-network analysis

Author(s)

Chrisna T. Permana, Chanel Tri Handoko, Konstantin Gomonov

Country(ies)

Published Date

March 2025

Access

Open

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uncres.2025.100175
Affiliation
1. Centre for Environmental Research, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Kentingan Jl. IrSutami No. 36, Jebres, Kec. Jebres, Surakarta, 57126, Jawa Tengah, Indonesia
2. Environmental Science Department, Graduate School, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Kentingan Jl. Ir. Sutami No. 36, Jebres, Kec. Jebres, Surakarta, 57126, Jawa Tengah, Indonesia
3. Department of Economic and Mathematical Modelling, Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University, 6 Miklukho-Maklaya Street, Moscow, 117198, Russia

Abstract

This research examines potential uses of hydrogen as an alternative energy source in Indonesia. Hydrogen presents a more environmentally friendly energy alternative with markedly reduced greenhouse gas emissions, leading the Indonesian government to align its interests with the worldwide excitement for hydrogen-based energy transitions within the sustainable development context. Nevertheless, despite its intriguing potential as an alternative fuel for transportation, industry, and power generation, pilot programs have demonstrated that hydrogen energy remains expensive and demands substantial advancements in technology. This study used a qualitative methodology, incorporating documentary analysis, semi-structured interviews, and focus group discussions within the actor-network theory framework, aimed to investigate the current positioning of hydrogen energy in Indonesia’s policy pathways and to examine its potential and challenge. The findings indicate two primary insights: firstly, Indonesia’s energy transformation is presently centered on formulating action plans and regulatory frameworks, with hydrogen seen as one of the proposed alternatives. The investigation of hydrogen’s current progress through the actor-network theory framework has yielded two separate actor networks: the proponent network, consisting of the national government and the national oil company, and the opposing network, which encompasses academics, businesses, and industries.

Stay updated!